“AOC, Obama and Stalin Walk into a Bar….” Sounds like a bad joke, but it’s actually the state of American political discourse.
Somehow, we have reached a point in the US where “socialism” is used to describe anything the right doesn’t like.
Free school lunch? Socialism. Regulating banks? Socialism. Public libraries with too many diverse books? Definitely socialism. A progressive Congresswoman proposing student debt relief? Obviously communist tyranny.
Having lived and worked in countries across the full spectrum of political and economic systems, I can assure you: the differences between these ideologies are real—and they matter. But here in the US, those distinctions are routinely erased.
Lumping every idea left of Ronald Reagan under the “S-word” is not just convenient, it’s deliberate. It is intentionally used to create confusion, shut down debate and discredit legitimate policy ideas by invoking fear and historical trauma.
It’s time to clear the fog.
TL;DR/Executive Summary
“Socialism” is misused in U.S. politics to label almost any progressive policy—often intentionally.
“Social democracy” embraces capitalism but ensures universal services to citizens (like in Sweden or Canada).
“Democratic socialism” aims to democratize key parts of the economy—not abolish democracy.
Socialism and communism are distinct, and far from current US policy proposals.
Ironically, the government gives billions in corporate subsidies—but only calls it “socialism” when it helps regular people.
SAVE the chart below and subscribe for more.
The S-Word Spectrum: What do these words actually mean?
Let’s untangle four terms that get tossed around as if they’re interchangeable: social democracy, democratic socialism, socialism, and communism. They all share concerns for justice and equality, but they differ deeply in their goals and methods.
The S-Word Spectrum: What these terms actually mean
Social Democracy
GOAL: Humanize capitalism by combining a market economy with a strong welfare state, labor protections, and universal public services.
Social democrats want capitalism to work for EVERYONE—not just the wealthy. Think: universal healthcare, paid family leave, quality public education, progressive taxation. Countries like Sweden, Norway, and Germany operate within capitalist systems, but with robust protections for workers and vulnerable populations.
⚠️ Misuse Alert: In the US, even modest proposals like subsidized childcare or student debt relief are often labeled “socialism.” But they’re actually standard features of most democratic capitalist countries.
Democratic Socialism
GOAL: Bring democracy into the economic realm—ensuring public control or ownership of essential services like healthcare, housing, and energy.
Democratic socialists believe profit should not dictate access to human rights. Their vision includes universal services, greater equality, and reducing the influence of corporate power—but through democratic means, not authoritarian control.
In the US, figures like Bernie Sanders and AOC are often branded as radical, but their platforms largely mirror those of social democracies—they just go a step further in challenging structural inequality.
⚠️ Misuse Alert: Right-wing media often conflate democratic socialism with Soviet-style communism. In reality, democratic socialists are staunch defenders of democracy, civil rights, and pluralism—and outspoken critics of authoritarianism.
Socialism
GOAL: Replace capitalism entirely with collective or state ownership of the means of production (factories, land, key industries.)
In theory, socialism aims to eliminate private profit and redistribute wealth and control to the people, often via the state or worker cooperatives. In practice, however, socialist systems have ranged from participatory models to highly centralized ones, with varying degrees of democracy.
⚠️ Misuse Alert: Today, “socialist” is slapped onto nearly any policy that challenges corporate power—even when the underlying system remains firmly capitalist.
Communism
Goal: A stateless, classless society where all property is held in common, and money is obsolete.
That’s the theory. In practice, no country has reached this end state. Regimes that have called themselves communist—like the USSR or Maoist China—didn’t abolish the state or hierarchy. They created authoritarian systems where a small elite held power over the masses.
⚠️ Misuse Alert: No current US policy proposal—certainly not public healthcare or tuition-free college—resembles communism. But that doesn’t stop opponents from invoking it.
Where the US Falls
Contrary to political fearmongering, the US is not—and has never been—a socialist country.
We are a neoliberal capitalist democracy: a system that prizes private markets, favors deregulation, and offers limited, means-tested public services like Medicare and public schools (many of which are under constant attack).
Most progressive policies being debated today—like universal healthcare or affordable college—wouldn’t replace capitalism. They’d expand who benefits from it.
Why This Confusion Persists
(Hint: It’s not an accident)
Calling everything “socialist” is a scare tactic. When conservatives (and even some centrists) conflate all left-leaning ideas with “socialism,” they are trying to:
Evoke Cold War fear to shut down policy discussions
Associate left-leaning leaders with dictatorship
Shut down debate by associating opponents with authoritarianism
Distract citizens from actual policy that would help society at large
Frame moderation as extremism to scare voters
It’s not about policy—it’s about shutting down debate. Calling AOC a “communist” is simply inaccurate, it is just meant to delegitimize her before she opens her mouth.
How to PUSH BACK when “socialism” is misused
You don’t need a PhD in political theory to respond to bad-faith accusations. When someone pastes the “socialist” label on a progressive idea, here are some clear, factual ways to respond and set the record straight.
“Socialism means collective ownership of industry. No one in Congress is proposing that.”
“Proposals like universal healthcare, tuition-free community college, or expanded childcare exist within capitalist systems in other countries.”
“Helping people isn’t socialism. It’s responsible governance.”
“Social democracy asking that basic needs not be tied to personal wealth.”
“The economy is STRONGER when people can afford healthcare, housing, and education, because they participate more fully economic activities.”
“Democratic socialists like Sen Bernie Sanders believe in free elections, civil rights, free speech and personal freedoms. Stalin didn’t.”
“Most people support some level of ‘redistribution’ of funds like Medicare, public schools, libraries when they understand it serves everyone.”
We spend $50 billion a year subsidizing fossil fuels in the US—but healthcare for everyone is somehow ‘too expensive’?
The more people understand these distinctions, the harder it becomes for politicians and pundits to weaponize ignorance.
Socialism for the Rich
Here’s the irony: the loudest voices crying “socialism!” over food stamps or student loan forgiveness are often the biggest supporters of government handouts to billionaires and corporations.
Corporate subsidies are the most socialist policy we have.
It’s only called ‘socialism’ when it helps regular people.
Student debt relief? Socialism. Child tax credit? Socialism. But a $2 trillion Trump-era corporate tax cut? Stimulus.
In addition, red states receive the MOST federal aid, farm subsidies, and disaster relief, yet their legislators call DC handouts ‘socialism’ when it helps blue cities or states.
Consider this:
The US loses $100–150 billion annually in corporate tax breaks and loopholes.
Amazon paid just 3.8% in federal taxes on $96B in profits (2011–2020).
Alphabet/Google paid effective tax rates well below the corporate standard.
The fossil fuel industry receives $20–50 billion per year in federal subsidies.
But when government helps working families? Suddenly it’s socialism.
The US government loses $100–150 billion annually in revenue due to corporate welfare
📣 Call to Action
Share this guide. Repost the chart. Use it to call out lazy arguments and fearmongering.
Push back when “socialism” is misused to manipulate fear and shut down solutions.
Subscribe to this newsletter for more explainer pieces, visual tools, and strategy insights to help you decode today’s political noise—and push back with clarity and confidence.
Words matter. When we allow “socialism” to become a meaningless insult—applied equally to Stalin and to school lunches—we lose the ability to understand the situation and talk about the future we want.
Whether you support capitalism, democratic socialism, or social democracy, the first step is understanding what we’re actually debating.
We all benefit from sharing the cost of streets and roads. Does that bother people? No. We love it. We love sharing. Some of us just don't know it.
The one major point neither of us made is that the vast majority of us have no where near the amount of liquid assets to qualify as "capitalists". We have no capital.
Yes, we live within an economic system that collects and focuses capital so as to allow for larger projects and also to insulate the capitalists from risk BUT we are the product and the market. Most of what happens in our lives is driven by systems other than capitalism. The family structure, the military, parks and public lands - none of that is capitalist yet we depend on them and more daily.
This is what we get for surrendering our willingness to learn and our ability to think logically. When you don't understand stuff, it is easy to demean it.